Hartz IV and how you look at the world sees fit
(fl) That the recalculation of the SGB II-control power (Hartz IV) was controversial, is nothing new, especially with regard to the debate about the demand calculation for alcohol and tobacco. But as shows us the welfare organization, seems far more understated. Because according to "South German Newspaper he has made on the basis of new empirical data, which has provided the Ministry of Labour in the Hartz-IV-agency committee of opposition available to its own calculations. This was confirmed on request by SPIEGEL ONLINE. "According to these calculations would be the adult Hartz IV recipients is not 364 Euro entitled, as the end of 2010 decided in parliament, but 394 €.
The amount of the SGB II-control power based on calculations of income and expenditure survey (EVS) of the Federal Statistical Office, in which about 60,000 private households about their income, their wealth, consumption patterns are surveyed. The control power is then assembled from the various editions and in the appropriate level. It so far the lowest 20% of the stratified by income single-person households, the EVS was used as the reference group. Where both the old version and in the 2010 adopted recalculation of the deduction, which are entirely dependent on benefits. But the 2010 recalculation has adopted only the lowest 15% considered as a comparison group, criticized the Welfare Association and the opposition. Also require the SPD-governed states that the so-called "AufstockerInnen" are eliminated, so that, despite the additional employment benefits must take advantage.
uses it to calculate not only new knowledge of the voluntary organization, the higher Hartz IV-standard benefits. However, it was from the Labor Department that the recent calculations "incorruptible" and that they founded is the change in the reference group with the exclusion of welfare recipients. However, the Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) in its verdicts of Hartz IV 02.09.2010 made it clear that the removal was necessary in order to avoid circular arguments. Therefore seems justified to ask whether this was expected to again cash position, which already noticed the Constitutional Court ruling on the initial calculation of the standard benefit, but then but rejected. It is hoped that, if it at the 15% reference group remains, the Federal Constitutional Court explained in a further decision, the Hartz IV law unconstitutional again.
For students of this topic in its role as that they can have IIS services such as on a leave of absence and other special situations are also entitled to SGB. The problem is that expenditure of students in the control power will not be accepted and not even in the so-called "educational package" for children (such as expenses for semester tuition and books). Therefore joins the SDS MLU of the minimum requirement of the Joint Welfare Association and the opposition, even if there would also be a higher standard benefit desirable.
- http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/soziales/0, 1518,739282,00 html
-. Http://www.focus.de/politik/weitere-meldungen/hartz-iv-keine -some-about-new-in-regelsaetze sicht_aid_590477.html
- http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article12126628/Wohlfahrtsverband-berechnet-hoeheren-Hartz-IV-Satz.html
- http:/ / www.morgenpost.de/politik/article1510746/Opposition-will-neue-Berechnung-fuer-Hartz-IV-Saetze.html
- http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/ls20100209_1bvl000109.html
- http:/ / www.destatis.de / jetspeed / portal / cms / sites / destatis / Internet / EN / Press / abisz / Einkommens__Verbrauchsstichprobe, templateId = renderPrint.psml
0 comments:
Post a Comment