How Many Units In A Insulin Syring

Find of the 10th Week

OWUS Association - An association, on the other bank of the Left Party

(r) I was at the annual meeting of OWUS. The members present were mainly between 50 and 70 years old entrepreneurs, and came mostly from the former East Germany. They are involved in the Left affiliated trade association under the common economic and political objective, "out of economic reason and social responsibility - is responsible for a truly fair competition for the best ideas and products, but also economic solutions that not only the expected cost of future generations, the environment or the poor working conditions of distant people out " 1.

links and entrepreneurs, this is not a contradiction?

In today's leftists accused time and again that they can not economically (that is always the most profitable and most profitable) think they do not make is to put forward sustainable and socially economies, so that the wealth can be distributed as fairly as possible.

A (s) left entrepreneur is faced with conflicting decisions, he / she wants to act socially and should be informed both the competition and provide market-based framework. But only if we have many entrepreneurs (from Friedrich Engels) as examples where social and sustainable economic success of a company's accounts, we are the left in this system show that left thinking the economy is not in the way. In exchange

OWUS many "old" politicians of the GDR and the FRG (68-term) with the experience of today's left and debate the right economic policy for small and medium-sized enterprises. However, the age structure and the loss of membership carries the risk that the acquired knowledge to future generations (U.S.) will not pass.

The association was supposed to act as a network, with the task of a "loyalty label": Each member should preferably buy from a comrade, because he / she knows that the staff members and pays relatively little exploited this company on sustainability. This contributes to the stabilization of the company at which benefits everyone. From this goal we are still far away, since this network is still small. Help we could contribute as consumers and even the Left, by seemingly access the services of OWUS companies.

OWUS attempts to revise the economic bias of the left, which is not easy. The "model" left entrepreneurs is not new, but only with OWUS it experiences a new political image. The association is on the Cooperation with the party relies DL because OWUS comes from the Left to more publicity, political influence and to new members.

same time benefit from the Left Get Left entrepreneurs and bring them into political life with. This "dependency structure" with the Left and the SDS would have to Solid familiar. There are also entrepreneurs in OWUS are not members of the Left, but still represented the views of the Left, just like the youth associations.

There is a lack of direct contact between OWUS and Solid / SDS, although both groups are close to the left. I do not know how far the left has so far helped associations with each other to make known, as the respective contact persons should rarely be the same.

However, it can not be that there is no cooperation, although the same objectives. Since both groups see economic problems from a different angle, they can learn from each other. With the combined knowledge we can collectively exercise more pressure on the left, so as to bring them more and more our rights.
was
According to the chairman of the OWUS BSpR (Bundessprecherinnenrat Solid) several times a letter, but unfortunately gave no answer. The youth organizations urgently need experienced speakers, on the camps and events can share their knowledge. In summer or Pentecostal camp when Marco holds an economic talk, it is full. OWUS could make a contribution to meet the thirst for knowledge from the real economic life. Long term, we grow out of the youth associations. Where if you want to get involved more political, but does not want to become a member of the left.

Most are solid students, some are even entrepreneurs, and they do not want to give up their left-wing principles. In OWUS find like-minded people. I hope that the associations for mutual benefit and build a closer communication can. This is important because we are OWUS tomorrow!

Vitamin Water Ski Discount Colorado

Open letter to the chancellor of graduate students

Dear Chancellor,

as graduate students will follow the current debate about the plagiarism allegations against the Federal Minister for Defence, Mr Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, with great shock and even greater lack of understanding. We have the impression that you are using all their power to hold a minister who, despite massive evidence to the contrary still gets the statement maintained that he had not deliberately misled in his doctoral thesis.
damage with this procedure, the federal government and Members of the coalition not only themselves, but much more.

Zu Guttenberg had already been in the last week to take apart several times previously protested his statements regarding his dissertation. The Internet community has succeeded in an unprecedented way to demonstrate a variety of unique plagiarism in the dissertation of Mr. Guttenberg. This evidence can be viewed by anyone and verifiable. It is hardly surprising that plagiarism experts agree that one can no longer speak of some "embarrassing mistakes." It is massive, systematic deception. Guttenberg has a large part of his dissertation - and apparently with great Ambition - and copied it and covered up sources, designed to obtain a doctorate, which he then promoted, not least at election posters. The University of Bayreuth was not able to dispel this charge. Given the size and number of plagiarism you know as well as we can at the end of that scrutiny by the University are only a result in terms of deception intention of the Minister. You can not do this "unconscious". designate

to this deception as such, it has nothing to do with the affiliation of the minister to a particular party. Even the politicians of the opposition we would demand the resignation as a minister, they had given their word of honor, have created their own academic performance, and only with the aid of the specified resource, and then failed in spite of massive way against it.

zu Guttenberg on 23 February 2011 in the current session of the German Bundestag noted that he would be judged as defense minister only after his work. He has played it on a formulation by you that you would not employ him as a "research assistant".

This is a mockery of all the scientific support staff and all graduate students who seek an honest way, their part in scientific Contribute to progress. You shall also suggest that if it were the fraudulent acquisition of a Ph.D. is a minor offense and that the "academic honor" is irrelevant in real life.

In compliance with the rules of good scientific practice, it is not "footnotes", not for trinkets, which are negligible in the face of larger political problems. It's about the basics of our work and trustworthiness. We therefore strive in our own work to the best knowledge to meet these high standards at all times. If we do not, we run the (rightly) risk of being expelled from the university.

The majority of us also teach younger students. Often it is our job to teach them the basics of scientific work. We keep the students here at this from the beginning to respect very careful to quote correctly and every resource to make marked as such. We do this not because we "footnote fanatics", or sit in the "ivory tower" and not know what counts in real life. It's simply about us, the understanding to share, so that scientific and social progress is possible only if one can rely on the honesty in the scientific community. Offend our students of this Code, we are required to assess their examination performance as inadequate. If repeated violation threatens usually be de-registered. After such a decision is the likelihood that the parties concerned deal in many professions denied - even in occupations where the personal integrity may be less important than in the office of Federal Minister for Defence.

Maybe we are old fashioned and outdated represented conservative values, if we entertain the view that honesty and responsibility should be values that should apply outside of science. Mr. Guttenberg seemed, until recently, that opinion to be.

Research is a major contribution to social development. Honest and innovative science is a foundation of prosperity in our country. If the protection of ideas in our society no more important value, then we lose our future. We expect no gratitude for our scientific work, but at least the respect that our work seriously. The treatment of the Causa Guttenberg as a minor offense suffering of science in Germany and the credibility of Germany as the "Land of Ideas".

but you may keep our contribution to society as simply negligible. Then we would ask you but not in the future speak more of the called by you "Education Republic of Germany".

Sincerely

http://offenerbrief.posterous.com/

Baixar pokemon deluge

Find of the 9th Calendar Week 2011

(jj) Since 16 February laugh now former Defence Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg (CSU) for nothing. It started with the allegations of the Bremer Law Professor Andreas Fischer-Lescano, the vacancy in Guttenberg's thesis as "brazen plagiarism" and "illusion" called. He said, "duplicates the text run through all the work and all the substantive parts." Guttenberg denies these allegations at this point and explains it as "absurd". He wrote the work after most of my knowledge. But in the weeks that followed, more and more clear Guttenberg has been written off over 80% of the work of numerous scientists.
Just one day after the first allegations of the criticism grew. The University of Bayreuth asked Guttenberg, take in two weeks to reply.
Shortly announced Guttenberg moment to give up his PhD, but still denies his dissertation was plagiarized. Because of possible copyright infringement and false affirmation, the first criminal charges against Guttenberg asked. The Chancellor has with him and expresses its confidence in Guttenberg from.
In the following days: abuse of office! New allegations against the lies of Baron are expressed. The opposition have accused Guttenberg misused the academic staff of the Bundestag to. At that time, hundreds of plagiarism hunters on the internet to more than 260 pages of text thesis written off have found. On 21
February Guttenberg now asks the University of Bayreuth withdraw his doctorate, wants to be but not resign.
Two days later, he admits he had "written very clearly erroneous thesis" one. At his office he holds firmly but still.
The opposition accuses him of having "deceived cheated, lied "- and had to go. Now he realizes from the University of Bayreuth Guttenberg title. On 24
February is reported that now also expresses the German University Association (DHV) to the plagiarism scandal. He criticized the behavior of parts of the policy as "outrageous". DHV president Bernhard Kempen said: "It is intolerable, such as the importance of science and its iron laws is neglected entirely political." And "Science is the search for truth. It thrives on originality and autonomy. The honest handling of data, facts and intellectual property makes the first science to science. Therefore undermine the credibility of plagiarism of science. "The Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel seems to the credibility of science are not much and has continued to Guttenberg. She argues for staying in Guttenberg's office with a strict separation of "Mortar and ministerial chair."
Two days later, accusing the president of the National Academy of Sciences, Jörg Hacker, Guttenberg, to be a bad example, "dishonest approach to writing scientific papers is an act that lacks respect for science and its basic principles . Many lawyers assume that Guttenberg used with intent other texts.
According http://de.guttenplag.wikia.com/wiki/Plagiate was the extent of plagiarism in the dissertation Guttenberg is up to 26.02. discovered had the following dimensions: 57 of 393 pages of text are subject finds plagiarism, ie 85.5% of the thesis text pages are fakes have been detected at this time.
Since 28 February protest now more than 30,000 citizens on the Internet with a letter to Merkel to deal with the "Causa Guttenberg (see the open letter to the chancellor of graduate students http://offenerbrief.posterous.com/ ). Several hundred people demonstrated in Berlin against the Defense Ministry and demanded Guttenberg's resignation. Now is also in the FDP's withdrawal brought into play. The FDP research politicians Martin Neumann gives him more "than two weeks time" to address the allegations: "When the circumstances of his promotion keep it leaves in the dark, I consider him as a minister and senior employer of two Bundeswehr universities no longer viable." Annette Schavan (CDU) has great sympathy for the discontent in science: "Piracy is not a trivial matter. And the protection of intellectual property is a valuable asset. "However, this would allow him a second chance. Ultimately, says
Gutenberg under pressure at 01 His resignation in March. On 02 March His successor is Thomas de Maizière announced.
Reactions to the resignation of Guttenberg's supporters and opponents can, for example, under http://www.morgenpost.de/newsticker/dpa ... tritt.html read . The reactions can be very good again recognize the mock and ignorant behavior Guttenberg's proponents to all honest scientists. For example, said the president of the Helmut-Schmidt-Universität der Bundeswehr, Wilfried Seidel: "The accusations against Mr. Guttenberg and dealing threatened to damage the reputation of science in Germany permanently. I therefore welcome the fact that Mr. Guttenberg's Respect to science and expressed his resignation averted by the threat of damage has.. " Guttenberg expressed his respect? What hypocrisy. It is sad how some people are still trying to play down to Guttenberg's behavior.
We agree with the opinion of the opposition and criticize the former Minister and the Chancellor. One can recognize this behavior as low but the value of education and science parts of the policy is appreciated. Who cheats so aware and then also denies the can not be trusted. It is shameful that the good Dr. Merkel as head of the government there makes such a difference and means the plagiarism scandal would nothing to do with his office. This had to be in the first debate as to whether Guttenberg resigns because of his fraud, is already a scandal in itself. As it should be obvious but facts.
Very well. He has resigned. But too bad, though, is how it came about. Would it not have been much earlier time? Why was not part of the population, the demand for his resignation long before loud? Why were there no protests because of his work as Secretary of Defense, which indeed was probably that of a minister of war?

http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/plag ... -1.1060774
http://www.mopo.de/news/politik---wirts ... index.html
http://www.neues-deutschland.de/dossiers/132.html
http://www.kj.nomos.de/fileadmin/kj/doc/zu_guttenberg.pdf