How Many Units In A Insulin Syring

Find of the 10th Week

OWUS Association - An association, on the other bank of the Left Party

(r) I was at the annual meeting of OWUS. The members present were mainly between 50 and 70 years old entrepreneurs, and came mostly from the former East Germany. They are involved in the Left affiliated trade association under the common economic and political objective, "out of economic reason and social responsibility - is responsible for a truly fair competition for the best ideas and products, but also economic solutions that not only the expected cost of future generations, the environment or the poor working conditions of distant people out " 1.

links and entrepreneurs, this is not a contradiction?

In today's leftists accused time and again that they can not economically (that is always the most profitable and most profitable) think they do not make is to put forward sustainable and socially economies, so that the wealth can be distributed as fairly as possible.

A (s) left entrepreneur is faced with conflicting decisions, he / she wants to act socially and should be informed both the competition and provide market-based framework. But only if we have many entrepreneurs (from Friedrich Engels) as examples where social and sustainable economic success of a company's accounts, we are the left in this system show that left thinking the economy is not in the way. In exchange

OWUS many "old" politicians of the GDR and the FRG (68-term) with the experience of today's left and debate the right economic policy for small and medium-sized enterprises. However, the age structure and the loss of membership carries the risk that the acquired knowledge to future generations (U.S.) will not pass.

The association was supposed to act as a network, with the task of a "loyalty label": Each member should preferably buy from a comrade, because he / she knows that the staff members and pays relatively little exploited this company on sustainability. This contributes to the stabilization of the company at which benefits everyone. From this goal we are still far away, since this network is still small. Help we could contribute as consumers and even the Left, by seemingly access the services of OWUS companies.

OWUS attempts to revise the economic bias of the left, which is not easy. The "model" left entrepreneurs is not new, but only with OWUS it experiences a new political image. The association is on the Cooperation with the party relies DL because OWUS comes from the Left to more publicity, political influence and to new members.

same time benefit from the Left Get Left entrepreneurs and bring them into political life with. This "dependency structure" with the Left and the SDS would have to Solid familiar. There are also entrepreneurs in OWUS are not members of the Left, but still represented the views of the Left, just like the youth associations.

There is a lack of direct contact between OWUS and Solid / SDS, although both groups are close to the left. I do not know how far the left has so far helped associations with each other to make known, as the respective contact persons should rarely be the same.

However, it can not be that there is no cooperation, although the same objectives. Since both groups see economic problems from a different angle, they can learn from each other. With the combined knowledge we can collectively exercise more pressure on the left, so as to bring them more and more our rights.
was
According to the chairman of the OWUS BSpR (Bundessprecherinnenrat Solid) several times a letter, but unfortunately gave no answer. The youth organizations urgently need experienced speakers, on the camps and events can share their knowledge. In summer or Pentecostal camp when Marco holds an economic talk, it is full. OWUS could make a contribution to meet the thirst for knowledge from the real economic life. Long term, we grow out of the youth associations. Where if you want to get involved more political, but does not want to become a member of the left.

Most are solid students, some are even entrepreneurs, and they do not want to give up their left-wing principles. In OWUS find like-minded people. I hope that the associations for mutual benefit and build a closer communication can. This is important because we are OWUS tomorrow!

Vitamin Water Ski Discount Colorado

Open letter to the chancellor of graduate students

Dear Chancellor,

as graduate students will follow the current debate about the plagiarism allegations against the Federal Minister for Defence, Mr Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, with great shock and even greater lack of understanding. We have the impression that you are using all their power to hold a minister who, despite massive evidence to the contrary still gets the statement maintained that he had not deliberately misled in his doctoral thesis.
damage with this procedure, the federal government and Members of the coalition not only themselves, but much more.

Zu Guttenberg had already been in the last week to take apart several times previously protested his statements regarding his dissertation. The Internet community has succeeded in an unprecedented way to demonstrate a variety of unique plagiarism in the dissertation of Mr. Guttenberg. This evidence can be viewed by anyone and verifiable. It is hardly surprising that plagiarism experts agree that one can no longer speak of some "embarrassing mistakes." It is massive, systematic deception. Guttenberg has a large part of his dissertation - and apparently with great Ambition - and copied it and covered up sources, designed to obtain a doctorate, which he then promoted, not least at election posters. The University of Bayreuth was not able to dispel this charge. Given the size and number of plagiarism you know as well as we can at the end of that scrutiny by the University are only a result in terms of deception intention of the Minister. You can not do this "unconscious". designate

to this deception as such, it has nothing to do with the affiliation of the minister to a particular party. Even the politicians of the opposition we would demand the resignation as a minister, they had given their word of honor, have created their own academic performance, and only with the aid of the specified resource, and then failed in spite of massive way against it.

zu Guttenberg on 23 February 2011 in the current session of the German Bundestag noted that he would be judged as defense minister only after his work. He has played it on a formulation by you that you would not employ him as a "research assistant".

This is a mockery of all the scientific support staff and all graduate students who seek an honest way, their part in scientific Contribute to progress. You shall also suggest that if it were the fraudulent acquisition of a Ph.D. is a minor offense and that the "academic honor" is irrelevant in real life.

In compliance with the rules of good scientific practice, it is not "footnotes", not for trinkets, which are negligible in the face of larger political problems. It's about the basics of our work and trustworthiness. We therefore strive in our own work to the best knowledge to meet these high standards at all times. If we do not, we run the (rightly) risk of being expelled from the university.

The majority of us also teach younger students. Often it is our job to teach them the basics of scientific work. We keep the students here at this from the beginning to respect very careful to quote correctly and every resource to make marked as such. We do this not because we "footnote fanatics", or sit in the "ivory tower" and not know what counts in real life. It's simply about us, the understanding to share, so that scientific and social progress is possible only if one can rely on the honesty in the scientific community. Offend our students of this Code, we are required to assess their examination performance as inadequate. If repeated violation threatens usually be de-registered. After such a decision is the likelihood that the parties concerned deal in many professions denied - even in occupations where the personal integrity may be less important than in the office of Federal Minister for Defence.

Maybe we are old fashioned and outdated represented conservative values, if we entertain the view that honesty and responsibility should be values that should apply outside of science. Mr. Guttenberg seemed, until recently, that opinion to be.

Research is a major contribution to social development. Honest and innovative science is a foundation of prosperity in our country. If the protection of ideas in our society no more important value, then we lose our future. We expect no gratitude for our scientific work, but at least the respect that our work seriously. The treatment of the Causa Guttenberg as a minor offense suffering of science in Germany and the credibility of Germany as the "Land of Ideas".

but you may keep our contribution to society as simply negligible. Then we would ask you but not in the future speak more of the called by you "Education Republic of Germany".

Sincerely

http://offenerbrief.posterous.com/